The president should not use his official enforcement power to promote his own political agenda. This will not only hurt his political opponents but also damage his electoral prospects for years to come. Further, this is inconsistent with the ideal of political competition. In a political contest, the incumbent President and his political opponent 상간녀위자료소송
Article II of the Federal Constitution lays out the powers of the president. In particular, it focuses on the first enumeration of powers. In essence, Article II says that the president has the executive power over the nation. However, some early state constitutions rejected the suggestion that the president is a king.
Article II also gives the president the power to take action against an enemy that threatens to harm the country. In certain circumstances, this power may not be limited to self-defense. While the Constitution does not limit the president’s power to act against foreign enemies, Congress does have the power to restrict his actions, especially when they are deemed necessary for national security.
The first sentence of Article II states that “the President shall be the commander in chief of the United States.” That statement is inaccurate as it fails to describe the nature of the power. In reality, the term “executive power” refers to the authority to carry out legislative projects. The term was coined by the English philosopher and theorist of royal absolutism, Thomas Carlyle.
The Constitutional Convention was divided over the proper composition of the executive branch. Some delegates, particularly Edmund Randolph, saw strong executive authority as a threat, and feared that a powerful chief executive would be a foe to the monarchy. However, some favored a plural executive.